Bank of England

Lord Myners: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they support the intention expressed by the Chairman of the Court of the Bank of England in evidence given to the Treasury Select Committee of the House of Commons on 15 March, to consider publishing all minutes of Court meetings; and whether the publication of the minutes will include minutes of previous meetings covering the period before and during the banking crisis.

Lord Sassoon: The Government await the findings of the Treasury Select Committee's inquiry into the accountability of the Bank of England and will respond to any recommendations in due course.

Banking

Lord Myners: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they judge that the strength of the economic recovery is sufficient to allow full implementation of the recommendations made by the Independent Commission on Banking.

Lord Sassoon: The Government look forward to receiving the Independent Commission on Banking's final report on 12 September and will then decide upon the appropriate course of action.

Banking: Northern Rock

Lord Myners: To ask Her Majesty's Government what impact current market conditions in the banking sector are having on the ability to obtain good value for the taxpayer from the disposal of the Government's interest in Northern Rock.

Lord Sassoon: In order to achieve the best value for the taxpayer, the Government are not providing commentary on the sales process and cannot comment on specific bids.

Dr Charles Alessi

Baroness Thornton: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether Dr Charles Alessi, previously a member of the NHS Future Forum, registered his business and other interests when he became a member of the NHS Future Forum; and, if so, where that information is available.

Earl Howe: The role of the NHS Future Forum was to listen to the views of as many people as possible about the Government's modernisation plans for the National Health Service, synthesise those views and make recommendations about how the legislation might be improved. The NHS Future Forum engaged with over 6,700 people at over 250 listening events, received 3,000 comments on the website, over 25,000 e-mails and 600 completed questionnaires. There was no requirement for any member of the NHS Future Forum to register their business and other interests when they became a member.

Dr Charles Alessi

Baroness Thornton: To ask Her Majesty's Government on how many occasions since his appointment the Secretary of State for Health has met Dr Charles Alessi; whether those meetings are on the public record; and whether a record of each such meeting is available.

Earl Howe: Dr Charles Alessi has, as part of a wider group, attended three meetings held by the Secretary of State. These were general round table discussions on the Health and Social Care Bill and as such there is no formal public record of the meetings.

Drugs: Pyridostigmine Bromide

Lord Morris of Manchester: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many groups other than veterans of the 1991 Gulf conflict have been or were prescribed pyridostigmine bromide; and what have been the side-effects for them.

Earl Howe: In the community, pyridostigmine bromide is licensed for the treatment of myasthenia gravis, paralytic ileus and post-operative urinary retention. Based on this information, it would be expected that patients with any of these three medical conditions could receive the drug.
	The recognised side-effects of a medicine are documented in its product information. This consists of a summary of product characteristics (SPC) for healthcare professionals and a patient information leaflet (PIL) which accompanies the medicine. The SPC and PIL for pyridostigmine are available to view online at: www.medicines.org.uk.
	Reports of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are collected by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and Commission for Human Medicines through the spontaneous reporting scheme; the yellow card scheme. The scheme collects ADR reports from across the whole United Kingdom and includes all medicines, including those from prescriptions, over-the-counter or general retail sales. Reports are also received for herbal medicines and other unlicensed medicines.
	As of 6 September 2011, the MHRA has received a total of 29 UK spontaneous suspected ADR reports associated with pyridostigmine. These reports describe a total of 77 reactions, two of which had a fatal outcome. A complete listing of all UK spontaneous suspected ADR reports associated with pyridostigmine is available to view on our website at: www.mhra.gov.uk/daps.
	It should be noted that healthcare professionals and patients are asked to report suspected adverse reactions on a voluntary basis and the submission of a report does not mean that the reaction cited was definitely caused by the medicine. Many factors have to be taken into account in assessing causal relationships including temporal association, the possible contribution of concomitant medication and the underlying disease being treated.

Government Departments: Surveys

Lord Kennedy of Southwark: To ask Her Majesty's Government who are the stakeholders that take part in the Export Control Organisation Customer Satisfaction Survey; and whether they will place a copy of the results of the survey in the Library of the House each year.

Baroness Wilcox: The Export Control Organisation customer satisfaction survey of 2010 was issued to a total of 1,618 individuals. Recipients included applicants for standard individual export licences, open general export licence holders, relevant trade associations, NGOs, and academics.
	The survey is conducted on ad hoc, rather than annual, basis. There are currently no plans to issue a survey for 2011.
	The results of the 2010 survey are already publicly available at: http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/eco/docs/10-1198-eco-customer-survey-analysis-2010.doc.
	We will arrange for copies of the 2010 survey, and future customer satisfaction surveys, to be made available in the Libraries of the House.

Government Departments: Surveys

Lord Kennedy of Southwark: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the information collected in the UK Innovation Survey.

Baroness Wilcox: The UK Innovation Survey provides essential data on the types, and extent, of innovation within businesses across all regions in the UK. It is a valuable resource for understanding innovation, drivers and impacts. The data are of high quality with a very high response rate for a voluntary survey.
	The data are used widely across government and academia for, among other things, the annual innovation report, international comparisons of innovation systems and evidence-based innovation policy. The last survey (UK IS 2009) found 58 per cent of firms engaged in some innovation activity during the three-year period 2006 to 2008. Recent research using the UK IS examined the distribution of innovation activity across UK industry and found innovation occurs within business sectors and regions not necessarily associated with innovative behaviour.
	Reports on main findings and commissioned research are published on the BIS website.

Government Departments: Surveys

Lord Kennedy of Southwark: To ask Her Majesty's Government who are the stakeholders contacted as part of the Awareness and Internationalisation Tracking Survey; who collects the information; and what assessment they have made of the information collected.

Baroness Wilcox: This survey is carried out for UK Trade and Investment by an independent market research company which specialises in surveys of businesses. The two most recent waves of the survey were carried out by OMB Research, which also independently sourced the lists of companies which were contacted for the survey. A full description of the methodology used is provided in the report on the 2010 wave, which is available at the link below, under the title International Business Strategies, Barriers and Awareness Survey (2010) at: http://www.ukti.gov.uk/uktihome/aboutukti/item/115739.html.
	The full report on the survey also includes extensive analysis of the data collected.

Health: GP Commissioning Groups

Baroness Thornton: To ask Her Majesty's Government how the Department of Health's guidance set out in The Functions of GP Commissioning Consortia: A Working Document, published in March, that GP consortia would have a general duty "To commission healthcare to the extent the consortium considers necessary to meet the reasonable requirements of patients registered with the GP practices who are members of the consortium" affects the rights of persons who are ordinarily resident in the UK, including those from other European Economic Area countries and abroad, to be registered with a general practitioner.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the criteria for GP consortia to register and deregister patients will take account of commercial and contractual reasons; and, if so, to what extent.

Earl Howe: Every general practitioner (GP) practice will be a member of a clinical commissioning group (previously known as GP consortia). However, the role of clinical commissioning groups in commissioning healthcare for whom they are responsible, is distinct from the role of the general practice in providing services to its patients. GP practices, rather than clinical commissioning groups, are responsible for the registration of patients at their respective practice.
	Clinical commissioning groups will be responsible for commissioning the majority of healthcare services. However, it will be the responsibility of the NHS Commissioning Board to commission primary medical care services.

Human Rights

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government what judgments finding a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights by the United Kingdom have been made by a chamber of the European Court of Human Rights since 1 January 2010; what were the subjects and names of the cases; which of those cases they asked to be referred under Article 43 to the Grand Chamber of the Court; and whether they maintain a record of cases where the United Kingdom was judged to be in violation of the Convention.

Lord McNally: Since 1 January 2010, the European Court of Human Rights has found violations by the UK in 18 cases as set out in the following table:
	
		
			 Case name Subject 
			 A. W. Khan v UK Removal to Pakistan; right to family life 
			 Gillan & Quinton v UK Stop and search powers 
			 Richard Anderson v UK Length of proceedings 
			 Al Saadoon & Mufdhi v UK Detention of suspects in Iraq; jurisdiction of the ECHR 
			 A.D. & O.D. v UK Decisions to take children into care 
			 M.A.K. and R.K. v UK Decisions to take children into care 
			 Allen v. UK Attendance at bail hearing 
			 Gift v UK Early release scheme discriminating against prisoners serving long, fixed-term sentences 
			 Kay and Others v UK Summary possession of people's homes 
			 S.H. v UK Risk of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment (removal to Bhutan) 
			 J.M. v UK Discrimination against same-sex couples in relation to child maintenance payments; recognition of same-sex relationships as "family life" 
			 Greens and MT v UK Prisoner voting rights 
			 McKay and BBC Scotland v UK Inability to challenge a court order prohibiting reporting of a criminal trial 
			 O'Donoghue and Others v UK Permission to marry for those subject to immigration control (Certificate of Approval scheme) 
			 M.G.N. Ltd v UK Fees in defamation cases and freedom of expression 
			 Sufi and Elmi v UK Removal to Somalia 
			 Al-Jedda v UK Treatment of detainees and detention of suspects in Iraq; jurisdiction of the ECHR 
			 Al Skeini & others v UK Treatment of detainees and detention of suspects in Iraq; jurisdiction of the ECHR 
		
	
	The UK made a request for referral to the Grand Chamber in four cases: Gillan and Quinton; Greens and MT; Al Saadoon and Mufdhi; and Clift.
	The Government do maintain a record of cases where the UK was judged to be in violation of the convention.

Human Rights

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to seek amendment of the European Convention on Human Rights, its protocols and procedures; and how long they estimate any such changes could take to be effected.

Lord McNally: When the UK takes over the chairmanship of the Council of Europe in November, the Government's top priority will be to deliver and build upon the ongoing reform process. The way the Court works is set out in the convention, so reform could involve changes to the convention if all 47 member states of the Council of Europe agree to it. The Commission on a UK Bill of Rights has given its interim advice on reform of the European Court, which the Government welcome.
	There have already been 14 protocols amending the convention since it was originally drafted, many of them making procedural changes. There is no fixed period to effect a change to the convention, but historically such changes have taken several years to bring into force.

Identity Cards

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the total cost to the United Kingdom Government incurred in the scrapping of the identity card scheme.

Baroness Browning: It is estimated that cancelling ID cards and the National Identity Register (NIR) will realise net savings of £86 million. The net cost of cancelling ID cards and the National Identity Register (NIR) was approximately £5 million.
	A breakdown of the costs related to the cancellation of ID cards is provided in the Identity and Passport Service annual report and accounts 2010-11, an electronic version of which is available in the Identity and Passport Service section of the Home Office website at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/agencies-public-bodies/ips/.

Northern Ireland Office: Staff

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Wallace of Saltaire on 5 September (WA 11) about the post of Director General of the Northern Ireland Office, (a) for how long Hilary Jackson held the post, (b) at what age her pension will become payable, and (c) whether the same conditions applied following the retirement of Sir Jonathan Phillips.

Lord Shutt of Greetland: The current Director-General of the Northern Ireland Office joined the department in December 2006 and took up her current post in April 2010 following the completion of devolution to the Northern Ireland Assembly. Her pension arrangements are determined by the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme of which she is a member. Sir Jonathan Phillips was also a member of the PCSPS.

Passports

Lord Rooker: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Browning on 11 August (WA 428), whether they will set out in general terms the approximate number of persons granted temporary admission to the United Kingdom for whom they retain travel documents.

Baroness Browning: The UK Border Agency granted temporary admission to approximately 6,500 people at UK ports during the period from 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2011.
	When temporary admission is granted to a passenger the passport and any other travel documentation is retained. Documents are held securely until the case is resolved and then where appropriate returned to the rightful holder.

Police: Hire Cars

Lord Tyler: To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the expenditure on hire cars for (a) unmarked patrol cars, (b) other purposes, for each police force in England and Wales in the last year for which figures are available.

Baroness Browning: The most recent and only data on vehicle hire expenditure held by the Home Office are for the financial year 2009-10, and have been sourced from the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) in the following table. These data cannot be split according to the purpose of the vehicle hire.
	
		
			 Force Expenditure on vehicle hire £000s 
			 Avon & Somerset 437 
			 Bedfordshire * 
			 Cambridgeshire 30 
			 Cheshire 544 
			 City of London 58 
			 Cleveland 171 
			 Cumbria 213 
			 Derbyshire 343 
			 Devon & Cornwall 469 
			 Dorset 92 
			 Durham 217 
			 Dyfed-Powys 90 
			 Essex 207 
			 Gloucestershire 105 
			 Greater Manchester 744 
			 Gwent 269 
			 Hampshire 210 
			 Hertfordshire 184 
			 Humberside 596 
			 Kent 281 
			 Lancashire 765 
			 Leicestershire 493 
			 Lincolnshire 506 
			 Merseyside 636 
			 Metropolitan Police 8,435 
			 Norfolk 523 
			 North Wales 76 
			 North Yorkshire 284 
			 Northamptonshire 215 
			 Northumbria 378 
			 Nottinghamshire 602 
			 South Wales 836 
			 South Yorkshire 552 
			 Staffordshire 1,735 
			 Suffolk 31 
			 Surrey 379 
			 Sussex 131 
			 Thames Valley 1,589 
			 Warwickshire 126 
			 West Mercia 617 
			 West Midlands 2,526 
			 West Yorkshire 581 
			 Wiltshire 48 
			 Total 27,324 
		
	
	Source:Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy
	* Data not available

Questions for Written Answer

Lord Harris of Haringey: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answers by Baroness Browning on 17 May (WA 301) and 14 July (WA 206), what were the reasons for the delay in responding to the two questions tabled.

Baroness Browning: I respond to all Questions for Written Answer as promptly as possible. Responses can be delayed for many reasons which include ensuring that appropriate advice or information is sought.